• Users Online: 179
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 93-98

Workplace violence as a predictor of work-related stress among doctors


Department of Community Medicine, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Date of Submission22-Feb-2022
Date of Decision15-Oct-2022
Date of Acceptance21-Oct-2022
Date of Web Publication29-Dec-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Adwitiya Das
1st Floor, Northern Block, 42C, Ramkamal Street, Kidderpore, Kolkata - 700 023, West Bengal
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/amit.amit_27_22

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Introduction: Workplace violence (WPV) toward health-care workers is increasing. The present study aims to estimate the proportion of resident doctors and interns of a tertiary care hospital who experienced WPV, to find out the perpetrators of WPV, and to ascertain any association between WPV and work-related stress. Materials and Methods: This observational, institution-based, cross-sectional study included resident doctors and interns working in six different departments of a tertiary care hospital. Data collection was done using a predesigned, pretested semi-structured self-administered questionnaire adapted and validated from the "WPV in the health sector survey questionnaire" from WHO along with "Perceived occupational stress scale." Results: Out of 323 participants, 247 (76.47%) experienced some form of WPV, 138 (42.72%) experienced physical violence and 203 (62.85%) experienced psychological violence. Patient relatives were reported as the only perpetrators of physical violence, while seniors of the study subjects were reported as main perpetrators of psychological violence. One hundred and thirty-four (42%) individuals reported work-related stress. On multivariate analysis, psychological violence was significantly associated with work-related stress. Conclusion: WPV was experienced by a high proportion of study subjects. Psychological violence was more frequently experienced, and senior colleagues were deemed responsible in most cases. WPV may be associated with work-related stress.

Keywords: Healthcare workers, resident doctors, workplace violence, work-related stress


How to cite this article:
Das A, Datta M, Banerjee S, Mondal S. Workplace violence as a predictor of work-related stress among doctors. Acta Med Int 2022;9:93-8

How to cite this URL:
Das A, Datta M, Banerjee S, Mondal S. Workplace violence as a predictor of work-related stress among doctors. Acta Med Int [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 2];9:93-8. Available from: https://www.actamedicainternational.com/text.asp?2022/9/2/93/365862


  Introduction Top


Workplace violence (WPV) may be defined as any incident where personnel are abused, threatened, or intimidated at the work site. WPV toward health sector personnel is gradually attaining alarming proportions worldwide.[1] According to the WHO, 8%–38% of health-care workers suffer from WPV at some point of time in their careers.[2] Others have found the prevalence of WPV even higher in the range of 56%–75%.[3] Studies in the past have shown that health-care personnel are more likely to experience WPV.[4],[5] India is no exception to this phenomenon. Various studies from India in recent times have shown a high prevalence of WPV among resident doctors.[6],[7] The chronically over-burdened hospitals, prolonged waiting periods, inadequate infrastructure, miscommunication, lack of manpower, lack of adequate security personnel, and commercialization of health care along with the critical role of media including social media may contribute to WPV against doctors. WPV toward doctors negatively affect both the doctor–patient relationship and effectiveness of health-care delivery system.[8] Relatives and visitors of patients are the most common agents responsible for physical WPV but co-workers and other hospital staff may also be responsible for psychological or sexual harassment.[9],[10] Incidents of vandalism by relatives of patients are usually instigated by sudden unexpected demise of the patient, or based on real or perceived medical negligence. The victim may sustain serious injuries resulting in grievous hurt or even death, which may give rise to strikes and agitations by the doctors. This results in the impairment of smooth functioning of the hospital and disruption of health-care delivery system. It is well established that WPV results in increased levels of stress among health-care workers.[11] Psychological stress can result in poor performance at workplace, absenteeism, and reduced job satisfaction, all of which may have adverse consequences on patient care.[12]

Although WPV is becoming increasingly common, studies on WPV are sparse, and those relating WPV with stress are even less in number. The present study was undertaken among resident doctors and interns working in various departments of a tertiary care hospital with the objectives to assess the proportion of doctors exposed to WPV find out the main perpetrators of WPV and ascertain if there is any relationship between WPV and stress.


  Materials and Methods Top


Study design

The present study was an observational, institution-based cross-sectional study.

Study setting

All resident doctors, i.e., undergraduate and postgraduate trainee doctors working at a tertiary level institute with multi-specialty teaching, training, and treating facilities, with at least 6 months of work experience were recruited for the study after retrieving informed written consent. The study period was 2 months, starting from September 1, 2019, to October 31, 2019.

Sample size

The sample size calculation was done using STAT CALC version 4.0 [Epi Info™, Division of Health Informatics & Surveillance (DHIS), Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology & Laboratory Services (CSELS), USA]. The total resident population was 1200 and the prior prevalence of WPV was considered 47.0% from a study by Kumar et al.[13] The estimated minimum error was taken as 5%, and the confidence interval was set at 95%. The estimated minimum sample size was 278. The sample size was inflated a further 10% to account for nonresponse and incomplete response each.

From internal reporting and monitoring data, it was observed that majority of the incidents of WPV occurred in the high-patient flow departments of internal medicine, general surgery, gynecology and obstetrics, pediatrics, orthopedics, and general emergency. Hence, these departments were focused on data collection and all the resident doctors working in this department during the study were approached. Sixty residents were randomly selected from each of the departments, using a random number table and the duty rosters during the study period. For the first five departments selected for data collection, undergraduate and postgraduate residents were recruited in equal proportions, excepting the emergency department where a positive pay system was done to account for the comparatively higher proportion of undergraduate residents. Separate list for undergraduate and postgraduate residents were maintained to allow due consideration regarding rotational duty, repeat postings, postduty day off and nature and frequency of shifts of duty. Hence, after rounding up, it was decided that 360 sealed envelopes containing the data collection pro forma, informed consent form and study information cum crisis resource materials will be distributed. Any residents refusing to participate or provide informed written consent were replaced by another resident of identical academic and work experience, posted in the same department. Data collection was done using a predesigned, pretested semi-structured self-administered questionnaire adapted and validated from the "WPV in the health sector survey questionnaire" (English) from WHO along with "Perceived occupational stress scale," adopted and validated to facilitate data retrieval from present study participants.

Validation of the study tools

The WHO "WPV in the health sector survey questionnaire" was an internationally validated questionnaire with items for the assessment of presence of WPV and the in-depth analysis of various types of violence encountered by the health care personnel along with the nature, the source and the reaction to physical, mental, psychological, and sexual violence at workplace.[14] It was pretested on a subset of 30 randomly selected residents from the same departments as the main study and were excluded from the main study results. A test–retest reliability of 80%–90% was observed across the departments, and the Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was 0.73. Semantic equivalence was assessed by a team consisting of an epidemiologist, a communication and linguistic expert and a psychologist.

The perceived occupational stress scale which deals with feelings and thoughts experienced during the previous month and the frequency of such feelings.[15] For each of the 10 items, there was a five-point Likert from "0" to "4," with "0" indicating "never" and "4" indicating "very often." For the items 4, 5, 7, and 8, the scoring was in reverse order. Scores ranging from "0" to "13" were considered low stress, and that ranging from "14" to "26" considered "moderate stress." Any score above "27" was considered "high perceived stress." Cronbach alpha of PSS scale was 0.62. The semantic equivalence was assessed using the same team of experts, and an equivalence of more than 85% was concurred. The variables for WPV in HSS questionnaire were magnitude and type of occurrence of violence, the preceding 6 months, the venue and timing of the incident, whether the incidents were reported and finally if any institutional actions were taken as a consequence. The demographic variables that were accounted included gender, academic rank of the residents, vernacular, the occupational variables were average hours of work per week, number of co-workers per shift, and respondents' perception regarding WPV. Operational definitions of the core variables were adopted from WHO's working definitions annexed with the WPV in HSS questionnaire. Physical violence was defined as "any degree of intentional physical harm by another person, including those of a sexual nature." This included pushing, beating, slapping, pinching, biting, inappropriate touching, and incidents of a similar nature occurring at one's workplace. Psychological violence was defined as "the intentional use of power to humiliate another person. This included verbal abuse, bullying, harassment, threats, and incidents of a similar nature occurring at or related to one's workplace." Stress was defined as "the response people may have when presented with work demands and pressures that are not matched to their knowledge and abilities, and which challenge their ability to cope."

Statistical analyses

The collected data were cleaned, checked for completeness and consistency, and entered into SPSS© version 17 (SPSS. Inc, IBM, Chicago, Illinois, United States). Continuous variables were described as mean and standard deviation (SD) and categorical variables were described as frequencies and percentages. For scores, median and interquartiles were also considered. Logistic regression analysis was done to assess the effect of different factors on the presence of Job-related perceived stress, by link function LOGISTIC by ENTER method. The final model was assessed for Goodness of fit and interactions were eliminated.

Ethical considerations

Informed written consent was sought from each participant. In the study information sheet, assurance for confidentiality, anonymity, and nondiscriminatory support and counseling resources for those who felt it necessary would be provided. It was also assured that nonparticipation or participation entailed no punitive measures or monetary benefits respectively.

The procedures and methods employed in this study follow the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study got ethical clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Medical College Kolkata (approval number MC/KOL/IEC/NON-SPON/447/08/19/2).


  Results Top


Out of 360 envelopes distributed, 323 completely filled pro forma were retrieved. Hence, the final study population was 323. The baseline characteristics are shown in [Table 1]. The mean age of the respondents was 25.31 (SD 2.69), with 65% male. Most of the study subjects were interns (225, 69.7%). Most of the participants (313, 96.9%) were concerned regarding WPV, but only 149 (46.13%) knew about the existence of WPV reporting system, and out of them, 119 (79.87% of 149) knew how to report WPV [Table 2]. Out of 323 subjects, 247 (76.47%) experienced some form of WPV. Physical violence was experienced by 138 (42.72%), and psychological violence was experienced by 203 (62.85%) individuals. 94 (29.1%) individuals experienced both types of violence [Table 3]. Patient relatives were the only perpetrators of physical violence, while seniors were the most frequent perpetrators of psychological violence. Despite high proportion of subjects experiencing WPV, the number of incidents reported to authorities was much less (34, 13.77%). When the participants were classified based on level of stress, it was seen that most of the subjects had moderate stress (64, 19.81%), as shown in [Figure 1]. While assessing the association of several factors with work-related stress, it was observed that on univariate analysis, age ≥25 years, female gender, mother tongue other than Bengali, presence of physical violence, psychological violence, or any violence were significantly associated with work-related stress. However, on multivariate model, it was seen that psychological violence and any violence were both associated with work-related stress (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.58, indicated good model fitness) [Table 4].
Figure 1: Pie diagram showing the distribution of study population according to the category of work-related stress (n = 323). N.B.: Stress was present in 134 individuals

Click here to view
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of the study subjects (n=323)

Click here to view
Table 2: Concern about workplace violence and knowledge regarding workplace violence reporting system (n=323)

Click here to view
Table 3: Details of violence experienced by the study subjects (n=323)

Click here to view
Table 4: Logistic regression analysis showing the effect of different factors on the presence of work-related stress (n=323)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Our study showed that a significant number (247, 76.47%) of doctors reported experiencing some form of violence at workplace. Psychological violence was more frequently reported than physical violence. While patients' relatives were the only perpetrators of physical violence, senior colleagues were mostly reported to be responsible for psychological violence. Verbal abuse comprised the predominant form of psychological violence. Most of the respondents reported experiencing physical violence during their duty in the emergency department. While physical violence was more frequently reported during night shifts, psychological violence was reported more frequently during morning shifts. Regarding job-related stress, it was observed that among those having stress (134), majority had moderate stress (64, 19.81% of those having stress). Psychological violence was more closely associated with job-related stress both in the univariate and multivariate models.

Different studies from various parts of the world have been undertaken on the phenomenon of WPV among health-care workers. The overall percentage of respondents reporting some form of WPV was 76.47%. Singh et al. found that 69.5% of resident doctors reported some form of WPV, while Kumar et al. found that 47% reported WPV.[8],[13] Psychological violence was more commonly reported than physical violence in this study, which is in keeping with findings from other studies.[16] WPV appeared to be more commonly experienced by female doctors in the study by Kumar et al.[13] In our study also, female doctors described experiencing WPV more frequently, and it was statistically significant in univariate analysis. It is a well-known fact that WPV can hamper well-being and predispose to stress or compromised sleep quality.[16] Anand et al. reported that all residents who experienced WPV were angry, frustrated, and irritable.[6] In another study among critical care physicians experiencing WPV, 23% described that WPV had a profound psychological impact.[17] A study from Rome also showed that work-related violence was a predictor for stress and other related disorders among emergency physicians.[18] It is sometimes difficult to tell whether stress is a consequence of WPV or the cause, as rightly pointed out by Magnavita.[19] Rasool et al. in their study on health-care professionals in Pakistan showed that WPV was associated with stress, anxiety, depression, and irritability.[20] Rayan et al. found a relation between burnout and WPV among nurses attending pilgrims at Mecca during Hajj.[21] WPV might be detrimental to heath-care worker's mental well-being and job satisfaction, as shown by Cheung et al.[22] In addition, WPV is also known to be associated with posttraumatic stress disorder, extreme mental fatigue, and burn out resulting in the requirement of specialist psychological help and counseling.[23] Further, studies have found a significant association between turnover intention and quitting of jobs with the incidence of WPV among health-care personnel.[24],[25] In some other studies, severe psychological effects of WPV have been associated with suicide among HCPs.[26],[27]


  Conclusion Top


Although our study had a limited sample size and was conducted in only one center, it indicated that WPV was a commonly reported incident among resident doctors and job-related stress was more prevalent in doctors reporting psychological violence. This might indicate that psychological violence needs to be given as much importance as physical violence. The long-term consequences of WPV as well as its association with work-related stress in doctors and other health-care workers need to be further explored.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Magnavita N, Heponiemi T. Violence towards health care workers in a public health care facility in Italy: A repeated cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:108.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
International Labour Office, International Council of Nurses, World Health Organization, Public Services International. Framework Guidelines for Addressing Workplace Violence in the Health Sector. Geneva: International Labour Office, International Council of Nurses, World Health Organization, Public Services International, Joint Program on Workplace Violence in the Health Sector; 2002. Available from: https://www.who.int/violence_injury./violence/./WVmanagementvictimspaper.pdf. [Last accessed on 2019 Jul 07].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Magin PJ, May J, McElduff P, Goode SM, Adams J, Cotter GL. Occupational violence in general practice: A whole-of-practice problem. Results of a cross-sectional study. Aust Health Rev 2011;35:75-80.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Bourn J. A Safer Place to Work: Protecting NHS Hospital and Ambulance Staff from Violence and Aggression. London: The National Audit Office; 2003. p. 54.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Kowalenko T, Walters BL, Khare RK, Compton S, Michigan College of Emergency Physicians Workplace Violence Task Force. Workplace violence: A survey of emergency physicians in the state of Michigan. Ann Emerg Med 2005;46:142-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Anand T, Grover S, Kumar R, Kumar M, Ingle GK. Workplace violence against resident doctors in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi. Natl Med J India 2016;29:344-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
7.
Ori J, Devi NS, Singh AB, Thongam K, Padu J, Abhilesh R. Prevalence and attitude of workplace violence among the post graduate students in a tertiary hospital in Manipur. J Med Soc 2014;28:25-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
  [Full text]  
8.
Singh G, Singh A, Chaturvedi S, Khan S. Workplace violence against resident doctors: A multicentric study from government medical colleges of Uttar Pradesh. Indian J Public Health 2019;63:143-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
9.
Morrison JL, Lantos JD, Levinson W. Aggression and violence directed toward physicians. J Gen Intern Med 1998;13:556-61.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Hesketh KL, Duncan SM, Estabrooks CA, Reimer MA, Giovannetti P, Hyndman K, et al. Workplace violence in Alberta and British Columbia hospitals. Health Policy 2003;63:311-21.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Lam LT. Aggression exposure and mental health among nurses. Adv Mental Health 2002;1:1-12.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Wieclaw J, Agerbo E, Mortensen PB, Burr H, Tüchsen F, Bonde JP. Work related violence and threats and the risk of depression and stress disorders. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:771-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Kumar M, Verma M, Das T, Pardeshi G, Kishore J, Padmanandan A. A study of workplace violence experienced by doctors and associated risk factors in a tertiary care hospital of South Delhi, India. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:C06-10.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Workplace Violence in the Health Sector Survey Questionnaire. Available from: https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/interpersonal/en/WVquestionnaire.pdf. [Last accessed on 2019 Jul 22].  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983;24:385-96.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Sun T, Gao L, Li F, Shi Y, Xie F, Wang J, et al. Workplace violence, psychological stress, sleep quality and subjective health in Chinese doctors: A large cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2017;7:e017182.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kumar NS, Munta K, Kumar JR, Rao SM, Dnyaneshwar M, Harde Y. A Survey on workplace violence experienced by critical care physicians. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23:295-301.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Cannavò M, La Torre F, Sestili C, La Torre G, Fioravanti M. Work related violence as a predictor of stress and correlated disorders in emergency department healthcare professionals. Clin Ter 2019;170:e110-23.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Magnavita N. Workplace violence and occupational stress in healthcare workers: A chicken-and-egg situation-results of a 6-year follow-up study. J Nurs Scholarsh 2014;46:366-76.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Rasool SF, Wang M, Zhang Y, Samma M. Sustainable work performance: The roles of workplace violence and occupational stress. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:E912.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Rayan A, Sisan M, Baker O. Stress, workplace violence, and burnout in nurses working in king Abdullah medical city during al-hajj season. J Nurs Res 2019;27:e26.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Cheung T, Lee PH, Yip PS. The association between workplace violence and physicians' and nurses' job satisfaction in Macau. PLoS One 2018;13:e0207577.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Brewin CR. Systematic review of screening instruments for adults at risk of PTSD. J Trauma Stress 2005;18:53-62.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Liu W, Zhao S, Shi L, Zhang Z, Liu X, Li L, et al. Workplace violence, job satisfaction, burnout, perceived organisational support and their effects on turnover intention among Chinese nurses in tertiary hospitals: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2018;8:e019525.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Eneroth M, Gustafsson Sendén M, Schenck Gustafsson K, Wall M, Fridner A. Threats or violence from patients was associated with turnover intention among foreign-born GPs – A comparison of four workplace factors associated with attitudes of wanting to quit one's job as a GP. Scand J Prim Health Care 2017;35:208-13.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Grover S, Sahoo S, Bhalla A, Avasthi A. Psychological problems and burnout among medical professionals of a tertiary care hospital of North India: A cross-sectional study. Indian J Psychiatry 2018;60:175-88.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
27.
Saini NK, Agrawal S, Bhasin SK, Bhatia MS, Sharma AK. Prevalence of stress among resident doctors working in medical colleges of Delhi. Indian J Public Health 2010;54:219-23.  Back to cited text no. 27
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed614    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded56    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal